There is a duty on the occupiers of premises to take reasonable care to ensure the safety of visitors. They should have in place procedures to assess their premises periodically, which identify all possible hazards and whether or not they need to take action to mitigate or remove the risks they pose.

The duty applies to:

  • Landlords
  • Homeowners
  • Shopkeepers
  • Bodies of authority
  • Private property owners
  • Public property owners
  • Public transport operators

Nevertheless, unfortunately, defects occur, incidents happen and injuries result. If you have been injured as a visitor to premises that were defective, we can help you to bring a claim for compensation.

A successful claim must establish that the occupiers failed their duty to take reasonable care and that this caused the suffered injury.

Usually, the circumstances of a claim will allow for a claim to be brought under Occupiers Liability as well as under the Defective Premises Act 1972, an ordinary Slip & Trip claim or an Accident at Work claim. For information on Occupiers Liability and the Defective Premises Act read below. For more information see our sections on Slip & Trip Claims and Accident at Work Claims.

line seperator


Occupiers' liability generally refers to the duty of a land owner to those who come onto their land. However, in some occasions this duty may be transferred to another person, hence the word 'occupier' is used. Liability may arise where the duty has been breached, which may be done through an act or an omission.

The law on occupiers' liability is contained in the following statutes:

  • Occupiers Liability Act 1957: imposing an obligation on occupiers with regard to 'lawful visitors'.
  • Occupiers Liability Act 1984: imposing liability on occupiers with regard to persons other than 'his visitors'.

To determine whether one is an 'occupier' for the purposes of Occupiers Liability legislation is a question of fact. A person will be an occupier if he maintains 'occupational control' over the premises: Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd [1966]. The person need not necessarily be in physical occupation: Harris v Birkenhead Corp [1976].

The 1957 Act imposes a duty of care on occupiers in respect to lawful visitors. Moreover, this covers not only land and buildings bur also fixed and movable structures, including any vessel, vehicle or aircraft: s.1(3)(a) OLA 1957. Under the 1957 Act a claimant may claim compensation for personal injury, death and damage to property.

The 1984 Act imposes a duty of care on occupiers in respect of persons 'other than his visitors': s.1(1)(a) OLA 1984. This includes trespassers, those who exceed their permission and those breaking into the premises with criminal intent: Revill v Newbery [1996]. The 1984 provides for less protection than the 1957 Act. A claimant may only claim compensation for death or personal injury.

line seperator


The Defective Premises Act 1972 aims to protect owners and tenants of defective residential properties, if the defect has been present on the completion of the dwelling and it has rendered the property unfit for human habitation. The 1972 Act imposes strict liability, which means that if a defendant has breached the provisions under the Act, they are automatically liable to pay damages to the claimant.

For a claim to succeed under the 1972 Act, it must be proven, on the balance of probabilities, that there is a defect in the dwelling (the meaning of 'dwelling' is assessed as a matter of fact in each individual case) which has been caused by:

  • Failure to carry out work to a suitable standard, or
  • Failure to carry out work with appropriate materials.

It must also be shown that the occurred defect has rendered the premises unfit for human habitation at the time of completion.

A time limit of six years after the completion of the building is set.

line seperator


Our expert team will work with you to take detailed instructions, and to consider all aspects of your claims and maximise the value of your claim. 

We can attend you at your home, if necessary, to discuss the following key points with you:

  • Accident circumstances
  • Funding

We have successfully concluded claims such as:

  • Ankle injuries caused by stepping on a broken floorboard;
  • Back injuries following a fall down defective stairs;
  • Head injuries from a falling cupboard.

line seperator


  • You should write a detailed account of what happened, including a sketch of the location.
  • You should take a photograph of the defect as soon as possible. Use a camera with a date/time function (if possible) and place an object next to it to give it some scale, e.g. either a ruler or a coin.
  • You must ensure that you have the name and address of any witnesses.
  • You should seek medical advice for your injuries as soon as possible. With some injuries (e.g. neck and shoulder injuries) the symptoms may take a few days to develop, but get medical attention as soon as you can.
  • You should keep a record of your out of pocket expenses (e.g. travel expenses, prescription charges, walking sticks, etc.) and keep any receipts.

line seperator


There are a variety of funding options open to you. We will discuss these options with you in more detail and where appropriate represent you on a no win no fee basis (also known as a Conditional Fee Agreement).

line seperator


If you would like to speak directly to a solicitor for a free and without obligation chat about your case call us on 0203 380 9406 or send us your details, with brief outline, by email to [email protected] and you will receive a prompt response.


  • Thank you CSO for dealing with my claim against my landlord/housing association so promptly and efficiently. I would have no hesitation in recommending you firm’s services.
  • Thank you for your time and service. I am very much delighted to inform you that I was very happy with your service and the compensation amount you made me to get for me. I am very much happy with amount I have received and great job done by CSO Legal. Thank you for being with me all this time. Thank you for your great services again.
  • I just wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you for all your assistance handling my case. I will not hesitate to recommend you to anyone in need of your services in the future. I appreciate your professional and honest approach.
  • Thank you for all your help. I will without hesitation recommend your firm as it has been a pleasure dealing with you.
  • We would just like to say thank you so much for all your hard work over the past few months! We can’t put into words how much this money will help us and how much we appreciate all your hard work.
  • Thank you and your colleagues for all your hard work, time and commitment to my case over the past three and a half years. I appreciate I have probably not been your easiest client! I think we got the best result that could be expected.
  • We would like to thank you very much for all your hard work and efforts on settling the claim in such an efficient way and would have no reservations about recommending you and your company in the future. We are both extremely grateful to you and very glad that the matter has now been concluded after three and a half years.
  • Many thanks for all you have done for us, and your kindness and courtesy at all times.
  • Thank you-your thoughtfulness meant more than words can ever say. You’ve been so kind. Thanks again for all you’ve done.
  • May I take this opportunity to thank you for all you did for my mother. I appreciate your steadfast professionalism in the matter and the kind and courteous attitude of yourself and the ream.